Evaluation of Residual Root Height and Width for The Fabrication of Rai in South India Population

Authors

  • Hamitha S
  • Sahana Selvaganesh
  • Thiyaneshwar Nesappan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52783/jns.v14.2428

Abstract

Introduction: The precision and accuracy of the study can be significantly improved by using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) into the assessment of residual root height and width for the manufacture of ROOT Analogue Implants (RAI) in the South Indian population. Comprehensive study of the residual root anatomy is made possible by the detailed three-dimensional images of the oral and maxillofacial tissues that are provided by CBCT imaging. Researchers can quantify residual root dimensions, such as height and width, with high resolution and little distortion by using CBCT. This makes it possible to precisely plan the placement of implants, accounting for elements including bone density, closeness to surrounding structures, and the best location for stability and aesthetics over the long run.

Materials And Method: A substantial and reliable sample size that can offer important insights into the anatomical features and suitability for implant placement in the South Indian population is the selection of a cohort of 300 patients for CBCT testing in the context of dental implants.

Results: A substantial and reliable sample size that can offer important insights into the anatomical features and suitability for implant placement in the South Indian population is the selection of a cohort of 300 patients for CBCT testing in the context of dental implants.

Conclusion: To sum up, the incorporation of CBCT technology in the assessment of residual root dimensions improves the precision and efficacy of RAI fabrication for the South Indian populace, hence leading to improved clinical results and patient care.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Conejo J, Yoo TH, Atria PJ, Fraiman H, Blatz MB. In vitro comparative study between complete arch conventional implant impressions and digital implant scans with scannable pick-up impression copings. J Prosthet Dent. 2024 Mar;131(3):475.e1–475.e7.

Ragul Prasath S, Jothi PA. Recent Advances In Dental Science - A Brief Review. Annals of RSCB. 2021 Mar 30;5975–90.

Sriram K, Duraisamy R, Mp SK. Survival rates of implants placed by undergraduate students: A retrospective study. J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 2020;30(3):173–8.

Song YW, Yoo SH, Jung UW. Effects of a modified surgical protocol on the positional accuracy of dental implants placed using fully guided implant surgery in the partially edentulous posterior ridge with distal extension: a dentiform model study. J Adv Prosthodont. 2024 Feb;16(1):1–11.

Fathima T, Kumar MPS. Evaluation of quality of life following dental extraction. J Adv Pharm Technol Res. 2022 Nov;13(Suppl 1):S102–7.

Moin DA, Hassan B, Mercelis P, Wismeijer D. Designing a novel dental root analogue implant using cone beam computed tomography and CAD/CAM technology. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013 Aug;24 Suppl A100:25–7.

Kaviya L, Santhosh KMP. Prevalence of Myths and Misconceptions Regarding Dental Extractions among Dental Patients: An Institutional Study. NVEO. 2021 Nov 11;5905–30.

Kensara J, Jayam R, Almanea M, Bin Rubaia’an MA, Alshareef N, Abed H. Radiological assessment of the inferior alveolar canal and mental foramen using cone beam computed tomography for pre-operative evaluation of surgeries in the mandible: A single-center five-year retrospective study. Saudi Dent J. 2024 Jan;36(1):91–8.

Mehta S, Rohinikumar S, Rajendra Prabhu A, Nesappan T, Veeraraghavan VP, Eswaramoorthy R. Correlation between CT - derived bone density and optimal bone densities acquired from CBCT scans. Bioinformation. 2023 Apr 30;19(4):495–8.

Sreenivasagan S, Subramanian AK, Solanki LA. Cortical bone thickness and root proximity of virtually placed mini-implants: A CBCT evaluation. World J Dent. 2022 Oct 1;13(S1):S39–44.

Prasad AS, Sivakumar A. ATM technique - a novel radiographic technique to assess the position of buccal shelf implants. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2022 Jul 1;51(5):20210346.

Sreenivasagan S, Subramanian AK, Chae JM. Comparison of treatment effects during en-masse retraction of upper anterior teeth placed using mini-implants placed at infrazygomatic crest and interradicular sites: A randomized controlled trial. Orthod Craniofac Res [Internet]. 2023 Jun 9; Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ocr.12679

Felicita AS, Khader SA. Comparison of two treatment protocols for intrusion and retraction of maxillary anterior teeth using mini-implants : A prospective clinical trial. J Orofac Orthop. 2024 Jan;85(1):13–29.

Bhalerao A, Marimuthu M, Wahab A, Ayoub A. Dynamic navigation for zygomatic implant placement: A randomized clinical study comparing the flapless versus the conventional approach. J Dent. 2023 Mar;130:104436.

Website [Internet]. Available from: https://doi.org/10.17762/sfs.v10i1S.174

Sharma MN, Ahmed N, Ganapathy DM, Pandurangan KK, Maiti S. Awareness on resonance frequency analysis in dental implantology among dental practitioners and dental students. J Adv Pharm Technol Res. 2022 Nov;13(Suppl 1):S233–7.

Putri A, Pramanik F, Azhari A. The Suitability of Trabecular Patterns in the Assessment of Dental Implant Osseointegration Process through 2D Digital and 3D CBCT Radiographs. Eur J Dent [Internet]. 2023 Sep 20; Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1772570

Hrušák D, Hauer L, Genčur J, Pěnkava A, Micopulos. 3D maxillofacial surgery planning - one decade development of technology. Acta Chir Plast. 2024;65(3-4):128–39.

Neelakantan P, Solomon AP. Dental Implants and Oral Microbiome Dysbiosis: An Interdisciplinary Perspective. Springer Nature; 2022. 101 p.

Dantas T, Madeira S, Gasik M, Vaz P, Silva F. Customized Root-Analogue Implants: A Review on Outcomes from Clinical Trials and Case Reports. Materials [Internet]. 2021 Apr 29;14(9). Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14092296

van Oirschot B, Han J, Leeuwenburgh SCG, Jansen JA, Yang F. Biological Processes in Gingival Tissue Integration around Dental Implants. Tissue Eng Part B Rev [Internet]. 2024 Mar 25; Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/ten.TEB.2023.0371

Kachhara S, Nallaswamy D, Ganapathy D, Ariga P. Comparison of the CBCT, CT, 3D printing, and CAD-CAM Milling options for the most accurate root form duplication required for the root analogue implant (RAI) protocol. J Indian Acad Oral Med Radiol. 2021;33(2):141.

Grandoch A, Peterke N, Hokamp NG, Zöller JE, Lichenstein T, Neugebauer J. 1.5 T MRI with a Dedicated Dental Signal-Amplification Coil as Noninvasive, Radiation-Free Alternative to CBCT in Presurgical Implant Planning Procedures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2021 Nov-Dec;36(6):1211–8.

Ibrahim CRM, Sameh A, Askar O. A finite element analysis study on different angle correction designs for inclined implants in All-On-Four protocol. BMC Oral Health. 2024 Mar 13;24(1):331.

Yuvashree CS, Venugopalan S, Nesappan T, Antony SDP. Comparing Closed Tray Implant Impression Techniques Using Snap-On and Impression Analogues on a Clinical Radiographic Scale. J Long Term Eff Med Implants. 2021;31(1):1–6.

Madeeh S, Gasgoos S. EVALUATION OF DENTAL CHANGES AFTER MINI-IMPLANT ASSISTED RAPID MAXILLARY EXPANSION IN YOUNG ADULTS: CBCT STUDY. Georgian Med News. 2023 Sep;(342):66–73.

Bilge NH, Dagistanli S, Karasu YÖ, Orhan K. Comparison of Pathologic Changes in the Maxillary Sinus Before and After Dental Implant Surgery Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2023 Dec 12;38(6):1115–22.

Nagendrababu V, Vinothkumar TS, Rossi-Fedele G, Doğramacı EJ, Duncan HF, Abbott PV, et al. Dental patient-reported outcomes following traumatic dental injuries and treatment: A narrative review. Dent Traumatol. 2023 Aug;39(4):304–13.

Rexlin PEJ, Cecil A, Eswaramoorthy R, John RS. CHARACTERISATION OF RESORBABLE AND NON- RESORBABLE SUTURES COATED WITH Punica granatum SEED EXTRACT: AN in vitro PILOT STUDY. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2023 Nov 11;101952.

Vedha Vivigdha A, Senthil Murugan P, Santhosh Kumar MP, Khuntia S. Effectiveness of promethazine on preoperative and intraoperative sequelae in cleft palate surgeries. Orthod Craniofac Res [Internet]. 2024 Jan 24; Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ocr.12743

Lee SY, Choi SH, Lee DW. Vertical Ridge Augmentation with Customized Titanium Mesh Using a 3D-Printing Model: A Prospective Study in Humans. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2024 Feb 27;39(1):153–63.

Zafar MS, Khurshid Z. Dental Implants: Materials, Coatings, Surface Modifications and Interfaces with Oral Tissues. Woodhead Publishing; 2020. 324 p.

Downloads

Published

2025-03-21

How to Cite

1.
S H, Selvaganesh S, Nesappan T. Evaluation of Residual Root Height and Width for The Fabrication of Rai in South India Population. J Neonatal Surg [Internet]. 2025Mar.21 [cited 2025Sep.14];14(7S):431-6. Available from: https://jneonatalsurg.com/index.php/jns/article/view/2428