A Prospective Study: Comparing Stump Closure by Hem-o-Lok Clips Versus Roeder’s Knot in Laparoscopic Appendectomy

Authors

  • Vinith. J. S
  • Shaikh Aaliah S Naaz
  • E. M. J. Karthikeyan
  • Praveen Kumar.S
  • Karthick Manikandan.A
  • J. Sridhar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52783/jns.v14.2084

Keywords:

Optimization, Phase Diagrams, Nanoemulsion, Oral delivery, Rheumatoid arthritis

Abstract

Background: Laparoscopic appendectomy has become the preferred surgical approach for acute appendicitis due to its advantages, such as reduced postoperative pain, shorter hospital stays, and faster recovery. However, the method of appendiceal stump closure remains a topic of debate, with techniques such as Hem-o-Lok clips and Roeder’s knot being widely used. The choice between these two techniques is crucial, as it impacts operative time, patient outcomes, complication rates, and overall cost-effectiveness. Despite existing research comparing the two methods, a consensus on the superior technique remains elusive. This study aims to compare the efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of Hem-o-Lok clips and Roeder’s knot in appendiceal stump closure during laparoscopic appendectomy.

Objectives: This study evaluates and compares the operative time, postoperative pain levels, complication rates, and cost-effectiveness of Hem-o-Lok clips versus Roeder’s knot for stump closure in laparoscopic appendectomy.

Methods: This prospective observational study was conducted at Vinayaka Mission’s Kirupananda Variyar Medical College and Hospital (VMKVMCH), Salem, from August 2022 to December 2023. A total of 60 patients diagnosed with uncomplicated acute appendicitis were included, with patients alternately assigned to two groups: Group H (Hem-o-Lok clips, n=30) and Group R (Roeder’s knot, n=30). Demographic variables, preoperative and intraoperative parameters, postoperative pain scores (measured using the Visual Analog Scale), incidence of surgical site infections (graded by the Southampton wound grading system), hospital stay duration, and cost of materials used were recorded. Statistical analysis was performed using Jamovi software, and results were analyzed with appropriate tests, considering p<0.05 as statistically significant.

Results: The two groups were comparable in terms of demographic characteristics and baseline health status. The operative time was significantly shorter in the Hem-o-Lok group (p<0.05), suggesting that clip application is more efficient than Roeder’s knot tying. Both techniques demonstrated similar outcomes in postoperative pain reduction, complication rates, and hospital stay duration, with no statistically significant difference observed. However, a notable difference was seen in cost-effectiveness, with Hem-o-Lok clips proving to be a more economical option compared to Roeder’s knot.

Conclusion: Both Hem-o-Lok clips and Roeder’s knot are effective and safe for appendiceal stump closure during laparoscopic appendectomy. However, Hem-o-Lok clips offer advantages in terms of reduced operative time and cost-effectiveness, making them a preferable choice for routine laparoscopic appendectomies. The selection of the technique may ultimately depend on surgeon expertise, institutional policies, and patient-specific factors. Further large-scale studies are warranted to validate these findings and establish standardized guidelines for appendiceal stump closure in laparoscopic appendectomy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Veziant J, Slim K. Laparoscopic appendectomy. J Visc Surg. 2014 Jun;151(3):223-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2014.03.011. Epub 2014 Apr 24. PMID: 24768620.

Blakely ML, Spurbeck WW, Laksman S, Hanna K, Schropp KP, Lobe TE. Laparoscopic appendectomy in children. Semin Laparosc Surg. 1998 Mar;5(1):14-8. doi: 10.1177/155335069800500104. PMID: 9516555.

Ostlie DJ. Single-site umbilical laparoscopic appendectomy. Semin Pediatr Surg. 2011 Nov;20(4):196-200. doi: 10.1053/j.sempedsurg.2011.05.003. PMID: 21968154.

Lee SH, Lee JY, Choi YY, Lee JG. Laparoscopic appendectomy versus open appendectomy for suspected appendicitis during pregnancy: a systematic review and updated meta-analysis. BMC Surg. 2019 Apr 25;19(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s12893-019-0505-9. PMID: 31023289; PMCID: PMC6482586.

Vernon AH, Georgeson KE, Harmon CM. Pediatric laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis. Surg Endosc. 2004 Jan;18(1):75-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-002-8868-9. Epub 2003 Nov 21. Erratum in: Surg Endosc. 2004 Mar;18(3):568. PMID: 14625753.

Köckerling F, Schug-Pass C, Grund S. Laparoskopische Appendektomie. Der neue Standard? [Laparoscopic appendectomy. The new standard?]. Chirurg. 2009 Jul;80(7):594-601. German. doi: 10.1007/s00104-009-1687-y. PMID: 19455285.

Pelosi MA, Pelosi MA 3rd. Laparoscopic appendectomy. J Laparoendosc Surg. 1995 Dec;5(6):419-21. doi: 10.1089/lps.1995.5.419. PMID: 8746997.

Bryson K. Laparoscopic appendectomy. J Gynecol Surg. 1991 Summer;7(2):93-5. doi: 10.1089/gyn.1991.7.93. PMID: 10150024.

Perea L, Peranteau WH, Laje P. Transumbilical extracorporeal laparoscopic-assisted appendectomy. J Pediatr Surg. 2018 Feb;53(2):256-259. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2017.11.012. Epub 2017 Nov 13. PMID: 29223668.

Fujishiro J, Watanabe E, Hirahara N, Terui K, Tomita H, Ishimaru T, Miyata H. Laparoscopic Versus Open Appendectomy for Acute Appendicitis in Children: a Nationwide Retrospective Study on Postoperative Outcomes. J Gastrointest Surg. 2021 Apr;25(4):1036-1044. doi: 10.1007/s11605-020-04544-3. Epub 2020 Mar 3. PMID: 32128682.

Gates NL, Rampp RD, Koontz CC, Holcombe JM, Bhattacharya SD. Single-Incision Laparoscopic Appendectomy in Children And Conversion to Multiport Appendectomy. J Surg Res. 2019 Mar;235:223-226. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.08.050. Epub 2018 Oct 31. PMID: 30691799.

Kumar S, Jalan A, Patowary BN, Shrestha S. Laparoscopic Appendectomy Versus Open Appendectomy for Acute Appendicitis: A Prospective Comparative Study. Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ). 2016 Jul-Sept.;14(55):244-248. PMID: 28814687.

Matthews BD, Mostafa G, Harold KL, Kercher KW, Reardon PR, Heniford BT. Minilaparoscopic appendectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2001 Dec;11(6):351-5. doi: 10.1097/00129689-200112000-00002. PMID: 11822857.

Sajid MS, Khan MA, Cheek E, Baig MK. Needlescopic versus laparoscopic appendectomy: a systematic review. Can J Surg. 2009 Apr;52(2):129-34. PMID: 19399208; PMCID: PMC2663504.

Baumgarten HD, Brown EG, Russell KW, Adzick NS, Laje P. Laparoscopic appendectomy - Outcomes of senior trainees operating without supervision versus experienced pediatric surgeons. J Pediatr Surg. 2019 Feb;54(2):276-279. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2018.10.092. Epub 2018 Nov 7. PMID: 30502007.

Tate JJ. Laparoscopic appendicectomy. Br J Surg. 1996 Sep;83(9):1169-70. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1996.02476.x. PMID: 8983601.

Downloads

Published

2025-03-12

How to Cite

1.
J. S V, Aaliah S Naaz S, Karthikeyan EMJ, Kumar.S P, Manikandan.A K, Sridhar J. A Prospective Study: Comparing Stump Closure by Hem-o-Lok Clips Versus Roeder’s Knot in Laparoscopic Appendectomy. J Neonatal Surg [Internet]. 2025Mar.12 [cited 2025Mar.20];14(5S):472-80. Available from: https://jneonatalsurg.com/index.php/jns/article/view/2084

Most read articles by the same author(s)