Clinical Profile, Risk Factors and Surgical Outcomes of Neonatal Emergencies: A Retrospective Observational Cohort Study from a Tertiary Care Hospital
Keywords:
neonatal surgery, surgical emergency, congenital anomaly, observational cohort study, risk factors, in-hospital mortality, Clavien–Dindo classification, referral delay, tertiary care, low- and middle-income countriesAbstract
Background:Neonatal surgical emergencies remain among the most demanding problems in paediatric surgical practice. Survival in high-income settings now routinely exceeds ninety per cent for most index conditions, yet reported mortality from tertiary centres in South Asia continues to sit between fifteen and forty per cent. Observational data from such centres suggest that this gap is driven less by the operation itself than by everything that surrounds it: late recognition, unstabilised transport, sepsis acquired before the neonate ever reaches a surgeon, and constrained neonatal intensive care capacity.
Objectives
To describe, through observation of a consecutive clinical cohort, the demographic and clinical profile of neonates undergoing emergency surgery at a tertiary referral hospital; to quantify the spectrum of diagnoses and their case fatality; and to identify, by statistical association rather than experimental manipulation, independent perinatal, referral-related and intraoperative correlates of in-hospital mortality.
Methods:This was a retrospective, single-centre, purely observational cohort study. No intervention of any kind was introduced, withheld, or altered by the investigators; every neonate received whatever care was clinically indicated by the treating team, entirely independent of, and prior to, this research. We reviewed case records, operation notes, anaesthetic charts and neonatal intensive care unit flow sheets for all neonates aged twenty-eight days or less who underwent emergency surgical treatment between January 2021 and December 2023, against a pre-piloted proforma. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality; secondary outcomes were major postoperative morbidity graded by the Clavien–Dindo classification, duration of mechanical ventilation and length of stay. Variables associated with mortality at a significance threshold of p < 0.10 on univariate testing were entered into a multivariable logistic regression model to identify independent statistical correlates; model discrimination was assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. As an observational design, this study can identify association, not causation.
Results: Of 412 neonatal admissions screened, 174 operated neonates formed the analytic cohort. The male-to-female ratio was 1.9:1, median gestational age was 37 weeks (interquartile range 34–38) and median birth weight was 2,480 g (interquartile range 2,050–2,840). Anorectal malformation (23.6%), congenital intestinal obstruction (18.4%) and oesophageal atresia with tracheo-oesophageal fistula (14.4%) accounted for more than half of all admissions. Overall in-hospital mortality was 25.3% (44 of 174). Case fatality was highest for congenital diaphragmatic hernia (47.1%), necrotising enterocolitis (42.9%) and oesophageal atresia (36.0%). On multivariable analysis, inotrope requirement (adjusted odds ratio 5.02, 95% CI 1.97–12.79), pre-operative sepsis (aOR 4.56, 95% CI 1.93–10.78), birth weight below 1,500 g (aOR 3.82, 95% CI 1.42–10.27), intraoperative bowel perforation (aOR 3.14, 95% CI 1.28–7.71) and referral delay exceeding forty-eight hours (aOR 2.87, 95% CI 1.21–6.81) were independently associated with death after adjustment for one another. The model achieved an area under the curve of 0.86.
Conclusions:In this observational cohort, mortality after neonatal emergency surgery was more strongly associated with pre-operative physiological state than with the anatomical diagnosis alone. Four of the five independent correlates identified describe features that are, in principle, modifiable earlier antenatal detection, structured referral pathways, protocol-driven transport and pre-operative stabilisation but because this was a non-interventional study, it cannot demonstrate that modifying them would causally reduce mortality; it can only identify them as priority targets for future prospective or interventional evaluation. The strength and consistency of the association between the pre-operative interval and mortality suggest that this interval, rather than further refinement of operative technique, is where such future interventional research would be best directed.
eywords: ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;
K
Downloads
References
1. GBD 2019 Diseases and Injuries Collaborators. Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet. 2020;396(10258):1204–22.
2. 2. Global PaedSurg Research Collaboration. Mortality from gastrointestinal congenital anomalies at 264 hospitals in 74 countries: a multicentre, international, prospective cohort study. Lancet. 2021;398(10297):325–39.
3. 3. Meara JG, Leather AJM, Hagander L, et al. Global Surgery 2030: evidence and solutions for achieving health, welfare, and economic development. Lancet. 2015;386(9993):569–624.
4. 4. Ozgediz D, Langer M, Kisa P, Poenaru D. Pediatric surgery as an essential component of global child health. Semin Pediatr Surg. 2016;25(1):3–9.
5. 5. Wright NJ, Leather AJM, Ade-Ajayi N, et al. Improving outcomes for neonates with gastrointestinal congenital anomalies in low- and middle-income countries. BMJ Glob Health. 2018;3(6):e000844.
6. 6. Chirdan LB, Ngiloi PJ, Elhalaby EA. Neonatal surgery in Africa. Semin Pediatr Surg. 2012;21(2):151–9.
7. 7. Ekenze SO, Ajuzieogu OV, Nwomeh BC. Neonatal surgery in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis of challenges of management and outcome. Lancet. 2015;385(Suppl 2):S35.
8. 8. Sharma S, Gupta DK. Surgical management of neonatal emergencies in a developing country: current status and future directions. J Neonatal Surg. 2019;8:20.
9. 9. Gangopadhyay AN, Upadhyaya VD, Sharma SP. Neonatal surgery: a ten-year audit from a university hospital. Indian J Pediatr. 2008;75(10):1025–30.
10. 10. Bhattacharyya NC, Baruah D, Saikia H. Pattern and outcome of neonatal surgical admissions in a tertiary care centre in north-east India. J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg. 2017;22(3):158–62.
11. 11. Ameh EA, Seyi-Olajide JO, Sholadoye TT. Neonatal surgical care: a review of the burden, progress and challenges in sub-Saharan Africa. Paediatr Int Child Health. 2015;35(3):243–51.
12. 12. Thaddeus S, Maine D. Too far to walk: maternal mortality in context. Soc Sci Med. 1994;38(8):1091–110.
13. 13. Wright NJ, Anderson JE, Ozgediz D, Farmer DL, Banu T. Addressing paediatric surgical care on World Birth Defects Day. Lancet. 2018;391(10125):1019.
14. 14. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240(2):205–13.
15. 15. Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, et al. The Clavien–Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg. 2009;250(2):187–96.
16. 16. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, et al. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet. 2007;370(9596):1453–7.
17. 17. Richardson DK, Corcoran JD, Escobar GJ, Lee SK. SNAP-II and SNAPPE-II: simplified newborn illness severity and mortality risk scores. J Pediatr. 2001;138(1):92–100.
18. 18. Ballard JL, Khoury JC, Wedig K, et al. New Ballard Score, expanded to include extremely premature infants. J Pediatr. 1991;119(3):417–23.
19. 19. Peduzzi P, Concato J, Kemper E, Holford TR, Feinstein AR. A simulation study of the number of events per variable in logistic regression analysis. J Clin Epidemiol. 1996;49(12):1373–9.
20. 20. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S, Sturdivant RX. Applied Logistic Regression. 3rd ed. Hoboken: Wiley; 2013.
21. 21. White IR, Royston P, Wood AM. Multiple imputation using chained equations: issues and guidance for practice. Stat Med. 2011;30(4):377–99.
22. 22. Levy MM, Evans LE, Rhodes A. The Surviving Sepsis Campaign bundle: 2018 update. Intensive Care Med. 2018;44(6):925–8.
23. 23. Wynn JL, Wong HR, Shanley TP, Bizzarro MJ, Saiman L, Polin RA. Time for a neonatal-specific consensus definition for sepsis. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2014;15(6):523–8.
24. 24. Shane AL, Sánchez PJ, Stoll BJ. Neonatal sepsis. Lancet. 2017;390(10104):1770–80.
25. 25. Investigators of the Delhi Neonatal Infection Study (DeNIS) collaboration. Characterisation and antimicrobial resistance of sepsis pathogens in neonates born in tertiary care centres in Delhi, India. Lancet Glob Health. 2016;4(10):e752–60.
26. 26. Laptook AR, Salhab W, Bhaskar B; Neonatal Research Network. Admission temperature of low birth weight infants: predictors and associated morbidities. Pediatrics. 2007;119(3):e643–9.
27. 27. Wilson E, Maier RF, Norman M, et al. Admission hypothermia in very preterm infants and neonatal mortality and morbidity. J Pediatr. 2016;175:61–7.
28. 28. McCall EM, Alderdice F, Halliday HL, Vohra S, Johnston L. Interventions to prevent hypothermia at birth in preterm and/or low birth weight infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;(2):CD004210.
29. 29. Spitz L. Oesophageal atresia. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2007;2:24.
30. 30. Pinheiro PFM, Simões e Silva AC, Pereira RM. Current knowledge on esophageal atresia. World J Gastroenterol. 2012;18(28):3662–72.
31. 31. Snoek KG, Reiss IKM, Greenough A, et al. Standardized postnatal management of infants with congenital diaphragmatic hernia in Europe: the CDH EURO Consortium Consensus — 2015 update. Neonatology. 2016;110(1):66–74.
32. 32. Chandrasekharan PK, Rawat M, Madappa R, Rothstein DH, Lakshminrusimha S. Congenital diaphragmatic hernia a review. Matern Health Neonatol Perinatol. 2017;3:6.
33. 33. Neu J, Walker WA. Necrotizing enterocolitis. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(3):255–64.
34. 34. Bell MJ, Ternberg JL, Feigin RD, et al. Neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis: therapeutic decisions based upon clinical staging. Ann Surg. 1978;187(1):1–7.
35. 35. Levitt MA, Peña A. Anorectal malformations. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2007;2:33.
36. 36. Holschneider A, Hutson J, Peña A, et al. Preliminary report on the International Conference for the Development of Standards for the Treatment of Anorectal Malformations. J Pediatr Surg. 2005;40(10):1521–6.
37. 37. Bradnock TJ, Marven S, Owen A, et al. Gastroschisis: one year outcomes from a national cohort study. BMJ. 2011;343:d6749.
38. 38. Kunz SN, Tieder JS, Whitlock K, Jackson JC, Avansino JR. Primary fascial closure versus staged closure with silo in patients with gastroschisis: a meta-analysis. J Pediatr Surg. 2013;48(4):845–57.
39. 39. Indian Council of Medical Research. National Ethical Guidelines for Biomedical and Health Research Involving Human Participants. New Delhi: ICMR; 2017.
40. 40. World Medical Association. Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA. 2013;310(20):2191–4
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.