A program Based on Cognitive Load Theory to Develop Secondary Stage Students' EFL Writing Performance and Reduce Their Writing Apprehension
Keywords:
writing performance, project-based cognitive load theory, writing apprehensionAbstract
The current study aimed to develop the secondary stage student's EFL writing performance and reduce their writing apprehension through a program based on cognitive load theory. To achieve this aim, sixty first-year EFL experimental secondary stage students from Alzawahrea, Alhussinia Directorate, Sharkia Governorate, Egypt, were assigned into two groups: thirty students for the experimental group and thirty for the control group. The researcher administrated a pre-test and a post-test for the purpose of data collecting and analysis. The researcher measured the EFL writing performance and writing apprehension level by designing an EFL writing performance and writing apprehension test before and after the treatment. A scale was designed to measure the effect of the suggested program based on cognitive theory. The instruments were administered before and after the treatment. Finally, the results of the study showed that the suggested program based on cognitive load theory and project-based learning has a positive effect on developing the EFL writing performance of secondary stage students and reduce their writing apprehension.
Downloads
References
1. Abu Shaaban, S. (2003). Difficulties Facing English Majors in Writing Research Papers. Unpublished M.A dissertation, The Islamic University Gaza.
2. Al-Ahmad, S. (2003). The impact of collaborative learning on L1 and L2 college students' apprehension about and attitudes toward writing. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana University of Pennsylvania.
3. Amin, E. (2016). Using ''Wikis'' in Developing Writing Performance and Motivation among EFL Students at Majmaah University. Journal of Faculty of Education, 105 (1).
4. Daly, J. A. & Wilson, D. A. (1983). Writing apprehension, self-esteem, and personality. Reaeach in the Teaching of English. 17 (4),327-341.
5. Hussein, H. (2015). The Effect of a Proposed Strategy-Based Writing on EFL Learners' Writing Skills. International Journal of English Language Teaching, 3(4), 98-224.
6. Kitchakarn, O. (2014). Developing Writing Abilities of EFL Students Through Blogging. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education-TOJDE, 15(4), 1302-6488.
7. Khelalfa, N. (2020). Examining three-way Interaction Effects of Dual N-back Working memory Training, Metamemory, and Anxiety Levels on L2 Writing Performance. PHD dissertation. Faculty of Letters and languages Department of English.
8. Nawal, A. (2018). Cognitive Load Theory in the Context of Second Language academic writing. Higher Education Pedagogies, 3(1), 385-402. https://doi.org/10.1080/23752696.2018.1513812
9. Trang, N., & Anh, K.(2020). Impact of Teaching Critical Thinking Tasks for Enhancing Paragraph Writing Performance of EFL Learners. International Journal of Education and Practice.8 (4), 784-803.
10. Sweller, J. (2016). Working memory, long-term memory, and instructional design. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 5(4), 360-367.
11. Sweller, J. (2017). Cognitive load theory and teaching English as a second language to adult learners. TESL Ontario.
12. Sweller, J., Ayres, P., & Kalyuga, S. (2011). Cognitive load theory. New York Springer.
13. Paas, F., & Van Gog, T., & Sweller, J. (2010). Cognitive load theory: new conceptualizations, specifications, and integrated research perspectives. Educational Psychology Review, 22(2), 115-121.
14. Yahiaoui, H. (2012). Problem-Solving Strategies and the Process Writing. (doctorate thesis). University of Oran
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.