The Effectiveness of a Program Based on Cognitive Approach and Corrective Feedback in Developing High Institute of Engineering and Technology Students’ EFL Oral Performance, Technical Vocabulary Use and Reducing Their Communicative Apprehension
Keywords:
EFL Oral Performance, Technical Vocabulary Use, Communicative Apprehension, Cognitive Approach, Corrective FeedbackAbstract
The current study aimed at developing the High Institute of Engineering and Technology 3rd year students' EFL oral performance, technical vocabulary use and reducing their communicative apprehension using the cognitive approach and corrective feedback. The current study adopted the mixed-method research design. A group of (74) High Institute of Engineering and Technology enrolled in the third year, 10th of Ramadan city, Sharkia Governorate in the academic year 2023/2024 were equally divided into a treatment group (n=37) and non-treatment group (n=37). The data were collected through an EFL oral performance recorded interview, an EFL oral performance checklist, EFL oral performance test, EFL technical vocabulary use test and a communicative apprehension Scale. These instruments were designed by the researcher and approved by a list of jury members in the field of TEFL. They were pre/post-administered to the treatment group before and after teaching the study program. The obtained data were analyzed using the Statistics Package for Social science (SPSS). The study results revealed that there was a statistically significant difference at (0.5) between the mean scores of the treatment group in the pre/post results of oral performance favoring the post results. The finding also revealed that the program based on cognitive approach and corrective feedback had positive effect on developing the High Institute of Engineering and Technology students' EFL oral performance and technical vocabulary use and reducing their communicative apprehension. Consequently, it is recommended to adopt the program based on cognitive approach and corrective feedback as a pivotal approach in teaching EFL oral communicative skills to develop EFL oral performance, technical vocabulary use and reduce communicative apprehension at universities and schools...
Downloads
References
1. Afshar, H .(2016). Speaking Skills Problems Encountered by Iranian EFL Freshmen and Seniors from Their Own and Their English Instructors’ Perspectives. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 13(1), 112-130. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/304476668
2. Ahmed, A. M. Y. (2020). Developing the speaking skills of English as a foreign language (EFL) preparatory schooler using self-study strategies (Unpublished master's thesis). South Valley University, Egypt.
https://journals.ekb.eg/article_113972.pdf
3. Belkhir, S. (2020). Cognition and Language Learning. Cambridge Scholars Publishing. Cambridge Preliminary English Test for speaking skills, pp.91-94.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/378374658
4. Ben-Eliyahu,A. and Moore, D. (2018). Investigating the Multidimensionality of Engagement: Affective, Behavioral, and Cognitive Engagement Across Science Activities and Contexts.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/322283338
5. Castillo, M.L. (2016). Using a virtual world as a communication space to supplement an online course platform for teaching oral communication skills to adult English as a second language learners. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Texas A&M University Kingsville.
https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED615084.pdf
6. Church, K. (2005). Effective oral communication in the foreign language classroom. Unpublished master thesis, University of Colorado.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327140979_10
7. Dudley-Evans, T. and St John, M. J. (1998). Developments in English for Specific Purposes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/248530597
8. Gałajda, D. (2017). Communicative Behavior of a Language Learner: Exploring Willingness to Communicate.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/318452258
9. Harmer, J. (2007). The Practice of English Language Teaching. (4th edition). Essex, UK: Pearson Education.
https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED582321.pdf
10. Khalil, A. (2015). The Effectiveness of a Training Program Based on Instruction Technology on Developing the Listening and Speaking Skills for Faculty of Education English Majors. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Faculty of Education. Ain Shams University.
https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1280098.pdf
11. Kim, H. H. (2013). Needs Analysis for English for Specific Purpose course Development for Engineering Students in Korea. International Journal of Multimedia and Ubiquitous Engineering. Vol. 8, No. 6 (2013), pp. 279-288.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/303828159
12. Lashari, T. A., Alias, M., Kesot, M. J., & Akasah, Z. A. (2012). An affective cognitive teaching and learning approach for enhanced behavioral engagement among engineering students. Engineering Education, 8(2), 65-78.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259760573
13. Leong, L.& Ahmadi, S, (2017). An Analysis of Factors influencing Learners’ English-Speaking Skill. International Journal of Research in English Education, 2 (1), 34-41.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/315437786
14. Liu, D. & Lei, L. (2019). Technical vocabulary. The Routledge handbook of vocabulary studies (pp.111-124), Edition: 1, Chapter: 8, Publisher: Routledge
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/335832862
15. Lyster, R., & Mori, H. (2006). Interactional feedback and instructional counterbalance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28(2), 269-300.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259427636
16. Lyster, R., Saito, K., Sato, M., Lyster, R., & Saito, K. (2013). Oral corrective feedback in second language classroom. Language Teaching, 46(1), 1–40.
https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/1f46
17. Mahmoodi,M.& Moazam,I.(2014). Willingness to Communicate (WTC) and L2 Achievement: The Case of Arabic Language Learners. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 98 (6) 1069 – 1076.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/275542871.pdf
18. Manurung,K.(2017). Implementing Interest Based Instructional Materials to Minimize EFL Learners’ Speaking Skills De-Motivating Factors. Journal of Practice in Language Studies, 7(5) 356-365.
tps://www.researchgate.net/publication/323914212
19. McCroskey, J. C. (2015). Introduction to rhetorical communication (9th ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
https://journals.aiac.org.au/index.php/IJALEL/article/view/4677/3589
20. Mediha, N, & Enisa, M. (2014). A comparative study on the effectiveness of using traditional and contextualized methods for enhancing learners’ vocabulary knowledge in an EFL classroom. 5th World Conference on Educational Sciences, (116).
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/273850823
21. Ndoye, A. (2017). Peer/Self-assessment and student learning. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 29(2), 255-269.
https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1146193.pdf
22. Oh, P.S., & Yager, R.E. (2004). Development of constructivist science classrooms and changes in student attitudes toward science learning. Science Education International, 15(2), 105–113.
https://files.eric.ed.gov/full text/EJ990516.pdf
23. Öztürk, E. Ö., & Öztürk, G. (2021). Reducing speaking anxiety in EFL classrooms: An explanatory mixed-methods study.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/353096104.pdf
24. Saeed,D. & Bostancı,H.(2021). The Impacts of Integral Teaching of the Listening and Speaking Skills on EFL Communicative Competence.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/363754562
25. Sheen,Y. (2004). Corrective feedback and learner up take in communicative classrooms across instructional settings. Language Teaching Research,8,263–300.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/373621147
26. Sothan, S. (2015). Exploring English Language Needs According to Undergraduate Students and Employers in Cambodia. International Journal of Linguistics and Communication, 3(1), p. 87-96.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320571421
27. Su-Yueh, W. (2008). Effective Activities for Teaching English Idioms to EFL Learners. The Internet TESL Journal, 14, 3,
https://journals.ekb.eg/article_24493
28. Vandergrift, L. (2002). Listening: theory and practice in modern foreign language competence. LLAS Centre for languages, linguistics and area studies University of Southampton, New York.
https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED582321.pdf
29. Witt, P. L., Brown, K. C., Roberts, J. B., Weisel, J., Sawyer, C. R., Behnke, R. R. (2006). Somatic anxiety patterns before, during, and after giving a public speech. Southern Communication Journal, 71(1), 87–100.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/377374221
30. Yang, Q. F., Chang, S. C., Hwang, G. J., & Zou, D. (2020). Balancing cognitive complexity and gaming level: Effects of a cognitive complexity-based competition game on EFL students' English vocabulary learning performance, anxiety and behavior.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/338602351
31. Zarei, A. A., and Rezadoust, H. (2020). The effects of scaffolded feedback on speaking anxiety and self-efficacy. Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies, 7(4), 111-132.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/353096104.pdf
32. Zhang, L. (2018). Metacognitive and cognitive strategy use in reading comprehension: A structural equation modelling approach. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/322175240
33. Zobler, Ana C., (2010). Effects of Listening Strategies Instruction on Listening Comprehension, Oral Proficiency, and Metacognition on Second Language
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.