Comparison of Chest X-Ray and Lung Ultrasound for Diagnosing Community-Acquired Pneumonia in Children
Keywords:
Community-acquired pneumonia; lung ultrasound; chest X-ray; paediatrics; pulmonologyAbstract
Background: Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) remains a leading cause of childhood morbidity. Chest X-ray (CXR) is the standard imaging modality but involves ionising radiation. Lung ultrasound (LUS) is a radiation-free alternative. This study compared the diagnostic accuracy of LUS versus CXR for paediatric CAP.
Methods: A prospective study was conducted on 150 children (aged 6 months to 12 years) with suspected CAP between January and March 2025. All children underwent both CXR (interpreted by a paediatric pulmonologist) and LUS (interpreted by a paediatrician) within 4 hours of presentation. The reference standard was a clinical diagnosis confirmed by follow-up at 14 days. Sensitivity, specificity, and inter-observer agreement were calculated.
Results: The prevalence of CAP was 72% (108/150). Lung ultrasound demonstrated sensitivity of 94.4% (95% CI: 88.1–97.9%) and specificity of 90.5% (95% CI: 77.9–97.4%) for diagnosing CAP. Chest X-ray showed sensitivity of 90.7% (95% CI: 83.4–95.5%) and specificity of 92.9% (95% CI: 80.5–98.5%). The difference in sensitivity was not statistically significant (p=0.21). Inter-observer agreement was substantial for LUS (κ=0.77) and almost perfect for CXR (κ=0.84). Ultrasound identified pleural effusions in 12 children (8%) that were missed on initial CXR.
Conclusions: Lung ultrasound has comparable diagnostic accuracy to chest X-ray for paediatric community-acquired pneumonia and offers the advantages of no radiation, lower cost, and bedside availability. Lung ultrasound should be considered as the first-line imaging modality for suspected CAP in children.
Downloads
References
[1] Farooqui H, Jit M, Heymann DL, Zodpey S. Burden of severe pneumonia in children under 5 years in India. Indian Pediatr. 2019;56(3):199-204.
[2] Shah SN, Bachur RG, Simel DL, Neuman MI. Does this child have pneumonia? The rational clinical examination systematic review. JAMA. 2017;318(5):462-471.
[3] Cherian T, Mulholland EK, Carlin JB, et al. Standardized interpretation of paediatric chest radiographs for the diagnosis of pneumonia in epidemiological studies. Bull World Health Organ. 2005;83(5):353-359.
[4] Kim KP, Miller DL, Berrington de Gonzalez A, et al. Paediatric CT radiation dose and cancer risk. Radiology. 2011;259(2):497-504.
[5] Lichtenstein DA. Lung ultrasound in the critically ill. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2014;20(3):315-322.
[6] Copetti R, Cattarossi L. Ultrasound diagnosis of pneumonia in children. Radiol Med. 2008;113(2):190-198.
[7] Long L, Zhao HT, Zhang ZY, et al. Lung ultrasound for the diagnosis of pneumonia in adults: a meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017;96(3):e5713.
[8] Pereda MA, Chavez MA, Hooper-Miele CC, et al. Lung ultrasound for the diagnosis of pneumonia in children: a meta-analysis. Pediatrics. 2015;135(4):714-722. [Note: meta-analysis updated in 2021 but original citation retained]
[9] Jones BP, Tay ET, Elikashvili I, et al. Feasibility and safety of lung ultrasound in the diagnosis of paediatric pneumonia. J Emerg Med. 2019;57(5):652-658.
[10] Stamato R, Mooney J, Hegde S, et al. Learning curve for lung ultrasound in paediatric pneumonia. J Ultrasound Med. 2020;39(8):1587-1593.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.