Complications Of Tads

Authors

  • Insiya Saify
  • Trilok Shrivastava
  • Chandresh Shukla
  • Syed Akbar Ali
  • Siddharth Dixit
  • Aakash Patel

Keywords:

Temporary Anchorage Devices, orthodontic mini-implants, complications, skeletal anchorage, stability, anchorage control, TAD failure, root proximity, soft tissue inflammation, peri implant infection, orthodontics biomechanics, risk factors, success rate o

Abstract


Temporary Anchorage Devices (TADs) have become an important adjunct in modern orthodontic treatment by providing reliable skeletal anchorage with minimal patient compliance. Despite their clinical advantages, various complications may occur during their placement and use. This article aims to review the common complications associated with TADs and their contributing factors. The most frequently reported complications include pain, soft-tissue irritation, inflammation, infection, screw loosening, and failure of primary stability. Root proximity, cortical bone perforation, and improper insertion techniques were also identified as significant risk factors. Patient-related factors such as oral hygiene and bone quality influence success rates. Operator experience and appropriate site selection play a crucial role in reducing complications. Early diagnosis and proper management strategies can improve treatment outcomes. Awareness of potential complications and adherence to correct clinical protocols can enhance the success and predictability of TAD-supported orthodontic treatment

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Proffit WR, Fields HW, Larson BE, Sarver DM. Contemporary Orthodontics. 6th ed. St. Louis: Elsevier; 2019.

2. Graber LW, Vanarsdall RL, Vig KWL, Huang GJ. Orthodontics: Current Principles and Techniques. 6th ed. St. Louis: Elsevier; 2017.

3. Bishara SE. Textbook of Orthodontics. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2001.

4. Nanda R. Biomechanics and Esthetic Strategies in Clinical Orthodontics. Elsevier; 2005.

5. Creekmore TD, Eklund MK. The possibility of skeletal anchorage. J Clin Orthod. 1983;17(4):266–269.

6. Papadopoulos MA, Tarawneh F. The use of miniscrew implants for temporary skeletal anchorage in orthodontics: A comprehensive review. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007;103(5):e6–15.

7. Reynders R, Ronchi L, Bipat S. Mini-implants in orthodontics: A systematic review of the literature. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009;135(5):564.e1– 564.e19.

8. Chen YJ, Chang HH, Huang CY, Hung HC, Lai EH, Yao CC. A retrospective analysis of the failure rate of three different orthodontic skeletal anchorage systems. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007;18(6):768–775.

9. Kravitz ND, Kusnoto B. Risks and complications of orthodontic miniscrews. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007;131(4 Suppl):S43–S51.

10. Kuroda S, Katayama A, Takano-Yamamoto T. Severe anterior open-bite case treated using titanium screw anchorage. Angle Orthod. 2004;74(4):558–567.

11. Motoyoshi M, Inaba M, Ono A, Ueno S, Shimizu N. The effect of cortical bone thickness on the stability of orthodontic mini-implants and on the stress distribution in surrounding bone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;38(1):13–18.

12. Park HS, Lee SK, Kwon TG. Group distal movement of teeth using microscrew implant anchorage. Angle Orthod. 2005;75(4):602–609.

13. Ahmet Keles, Nejat Erverdi, Serdar Sezen Bodily Distalization of Molars with Absolute Anchorage. Angle Orthod:2003:73: 471-482.

14. Badri Thiruvenkatachari, Pavitranand Ammayappan, Rajasigamani Kandaswamy. Comparison of rate of canine retraction with conventional molar anchorage and titanium implant anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008;134: 1: 30-35

15. Becker W. Sennerby L, Becker Be, Henry P. Clinical and histologic findings for micro implants placed in one stage and loaded for three months.Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2002;4(1):47-52

16. Birte Melsen. Tissue reaction following application of extrusive and intrusive forces to teeth in adult monkeys. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 1986; 89(6): 469-475.

17. Birte Melsen. Widening the orthodontic possibilities with the aarhus anchorage. Journal of Paradontology 2001; 19: 333-347.

18. Birte melsen. Overview Mini Implants: where are we; J Clin Orthod: 2005; 39:9:539-547.

19. Birte Melsen and Carlalberta Verna. Miniscrew Implants: The Aarhus Anchorage System. Semin Orthod. 2005:11:24-31

20. Block and Hoffman. Absolute anchorage device. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1995;107:251-258

21. Byung-Ho Choi, Han-Sung Kim, Chang-Yong ko, Seung-Mi Jeong et. al. Ingestion of orthodontic anchorage screws. An experimental study in dogs. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007; 131:767-8.

22. Camillo Morea et.al: Surgical guide for optimal positioning of mini-implant: j. clin orthod.2005;39:5:317-321.

23. Chung- Chen Jane Yao, Eddie Hiang-Hua Lai, Yi-Jane Chen et.al. Comparison of treatment outcomes between skeletal anchorage and extraoral anchorage in adults with maxillary dentoalveolar protrusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008;134:615-24.

24. Chung- Chen Jane Yao, Chou-Bing Wu, Hung-Yi Wu et al. Intrusion of the Overerupted Upper Left First and Second Molars by Mini- Implants with Partial-Fixed Orthodontic Appliances: A case report. Angle Orthod 2004;74:550-557.

25. De Pauw Ga, Dermaut L. De Bruyn H. Johansson C Stability of implants as anchorage for orthopedic traction. Angle Orthod. 1999; 69(5):401-407.

26. De Clerck H, Geerinckx V and Siciliano S. The Zygoma Anchorage System. J Clin Orthod, 2002;36:455-459.

27. Eduardo Yugo Suzuki et.al: An Adjustable Surgical Guide for Miniscrew Placement: j. clin orthod.2005;39;10;588-590

28. Eduardo yugo Suzuki et.al. A Simple 3-D guide for miniscrew placement: J.clin.orthod.2007;6:342-346

29. Emel Sari, Cihan Ucar. Interleukin 1ẞ levels around Microscrew implants during orthodontic tooth movement. Angle Orthod 2007;77:6:1073-77.

30. Eugene Roberts. W, Ricky K. Smith, Yerucham Zilberman, Peter G. Mozsary, D Robert S. Smith Osseous adaptation to continuous loading of rigid endosseous implants Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 1984; 86(2):95-11.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-12

How to Cite

1.
Saify I, Shrivastava T, Shukla C, Ali SA, Dixit S, Patel A. Complications Of Tads. J Neonatal Surg [Internet]. 2025 Dec. 12 [cited 2026 May 9];14(33S):949-60. Available from: https://jneonatalsurg.com/index.php/jns/article/view/10178

Issue

Vol. 14 No. 33S (2025): Journal of Neonatal Surgery

Section

Original Article

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

You are free to:

  • Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.

Terms:

  • Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
  • No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.