Association of Parental Consanguinity with Severity of Cleft Lip and Palate.
Keywords:
Cleft lip, cleft palate, consanguinity, severity, congenital anomaliesAbstract
Background: Cleft lip and palate are among the most common congenital craniofacial anomalies worldwide. Parental consanguinity has been identified as a potential risk factor for congenital anomalies; however, its association with the severity of cleft deformities has not been extensively explored.
Aim: To evaluate the association between parental consanguinity and the severity and pattern of cleft lip and palate.
Materials and Methods: A hospital-based observational study was conducted on patients presenting with cleft lip and/or palate. Data regarding demographic details, degree of parental consanguinity, type of cleft, laterality, and presence of associated anomalies were recorded. Severity of cleft was categorized into cleft lip alone, cleft palate alone, unilateral cleft lip and palate, and bilateral cleft lip and palate. Statistical analysis was performed to assess associations between consanguinity and cleft severity.
Results: A higher proportion of severe cleft patterns, particularly bilateral cleft lip and palate, was observed in patients born of consanguineous marriages. A statistically significant association was noted between degree of consanguinity and increasing severity of cleft deformity.
Conclusion: Parental consanguinity is associated not only with the occurrence of cleft lip and palate but also with increased severity of the deformity. These findings highlight the importance of genetic counseling and public health education in populations where consanguineous marriages are prevalent..
Downloads
References
1. Mossey PA, Modell B. Epidemiology of oral clefts 2012: an international perspective. Front Oral Biol. 2012;16:1–18.
2. Al-Ani ZR, Al-Hadithi TS. Consanguinity and its effect on cleft lip and palate. East Mediterr Health J. 2011;17(4):320–326.
3. Bittles AH. Consanguinity and its relevance to clinical genetics. Clin Genet. 2001;60(2):89–98.
4. Derijcke A, Eerens A, Carels C. The incidence of oral clefts: a review. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1996;34(6):488–494.
5. Shaw GM, Carmichael SL, Kaidarova Z, Harris JA. Epidemiologic characteristics of orofacial clefts among live births in California. Teratology. 2000;61(3):177–182.
6. Tolarova MM, Cervenka J. Classification and birth prevalence of orofacial clefts. Am J Med Genet. 1998;75(2):126–137
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.