Biomechanical Analysis of Various Knee Prosthesis Biomaterials Under Different Flexion Angles Using Finite Element Method

Authors

  • Sanjay. S
  • Shashishekar. C

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63682/jns.v14i19S.10045

Keywords:

Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA), Finite Element Analysis (FEA), Sagittal Radius, Prosthetic Joint, Flexion Angle

Abstract

This study employs finite element analysis (FEA) to investigate the biomechanical performance of various biomaterials commonly used in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) under different geometric and flexion conditions. Three-dimensional CAD models of knee implants were developed with varying femoral component geometries—diameters of 60 mm, 65 mm, 70 mm, 75 mm, and 80 mm; sagittal radii of 45 mm and 50 mm, all analysed at a fixed flexion angle of 30°. The materials evaluated include Ti-6Al-4V, Co-Cr-Mo, and stainless steel for the femoral component, and ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) for the tibial insert. Realistic material properties and simulated physiological loading were applied to assess the implant's mechanical response. Parameters such as Von Mises stress, The findings provide critical insight into the effect of material selection and femoral geometry on stress distribution and overall implant durability. This analysis aids in optimizing TKA design for improved performance, longevity, and patient outcomes..



Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Zhang Zhang, Z., Qi, Y., Wei, B., Bao, H., & Xu, Y. (2023). Application strategy of finite element analysis in artificial knee arthroplasty. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2023.1127289

[2] Shashishekar, C., & Ramesh, C. S. (2007). Finite element analysis of prosthetic knee joint using ANSYS. WIT Transactions on Biomedicine and Health. https://doi.org/10.2495/bio070071

[3] Saurabh samadhiya , Amit Yadav & Dr. B.R Rawal (2014). Biomechanical Analysis of Different Knee Prosthesis Biomaterials Using FEM. IOSR Journal of Mechanical and Civil Engineering . e-ISSN: 2278-1684,p-ISSN: 2320-334X, Volume 11, Issue 3 Ver. IV.PP 120-128.

[4] Kumar, D., & Maiti, R. (2025). Finite Element Analysis of knee Implant Materials under cyclic loading condition: An analysis of failures. IRBM, 46(3), 100893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irbm.2025.100893

[5] Bhandarkar, S., & Dhatrak, P. (2021). Optimization of a knee implant with different biomaterials using finite element analysis. Materials Today Proceedings, 59, 459–467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.11.466

[6] Richa Rai & Vikas Rastogi.( 2020). FEA Analysis of the Knee Joint, During Knee Flexion Movement. International Journal of Engineering Research in Mechanical and Civil Engineering (IJERMCE) .Vol 5, Issue

[7] International Organization for Standardization. (2009). ISO 14243-1: Implants for surgery — Joint prostheses — Part 1: Determination of endurance properties and performance of knee prostheses. ISO-14243-1-2009.pdf.

[8] Koo, Y., & Koo, S. (2019). Three-Dimensional kinematic coupling of the healthy knee during treadmill walking. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, 141(8). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4043562

[9] Marinela Petoa , Erick Ramírez-Cedillob,c, Adriana Hernándezd , Hector R. Siller, Structural design optimization of knee replacement implants for Additive Manufacturing, Procedia Manufacturing ,(2019) , Volume.34 , P.574–583

[10] Carr, B. C., & Goswami, T, Knee implants – Review of models and biomechanics. Materials & Design, (2009). Volume. 30, Issue (2), P.398–41

[11] D. Zhao, H. Sakoda, W. G. Sawyer, S. A. Banks, and B. J. Fregly (2008), Predicting knee replacement damage in a simulator machine using a computational model with a consistent wear factor, Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, , Volume.130, P. 011004-1- 011004-10.

[12] M.A.Lafortune , P.R.Cavanagh, H.J.Sommer, A.Kalenak(1992),Three-dimensional kinematics of the human knee during walking, , Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, Volume:25, Issue: (4), P.347 57.B. Morrison, The Mechanics of The Knee Joint in Relation to Normal Walking, Journal of Biomechanics,1970,Volume. 3, Issue:1, P. 51-61.

[13] Carr, B. C., & Goswami (2009), T, Knee implants – Review of models and biomechanics. Materials & Design,. Volume. 30, Issue (2), P.398–41

[14] Dr. Shashishekar C, Sanjay S.J., Veereshkumar. Ambiger, Nagappa.V Sankannavar, Veeranna R. Kattimani (2025). Effect Of Finite Element Analysis On Knee Implant Materials Under Static Conditions . Cuest.fisioter 54(3):3111-3123

Downloads

Published

2025-04-25

How to Cite

1.
S S, C S. Biomechanical Analysis of Various Knee Prosthesis Biomaterials Under Different Flexion Angles Using Finite Element Method. J Neonatal Surg [Internet]. 2025 Apr. 25 [cited 2026 Mar. 11];14(19S):1150-9. Available from: https://jneonatalsurg.com/index.php/jns/article/view/10045

Issue

Vol. 14 No. 19S (2025): Journal of Neonatal Surgery

Section

Original Article

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

You are free to:

  • Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.

Terms:

  • Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
  • No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.