Hypospadias with its Surgical Management: A Comprehensive Review of Surgical Disease in Children
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63682/jns.v14i28S.10038Keywords:
Hypospadias, urethroplasty, tubularized incised plate, Bracka repair, pediatric urology, congenital anomaliesAbstract
Hypospadias is one of the most common congenital anomalies affecting the male genital tract, with an estimated prevalence of 1 in 150 to 300 male births worldwide. This comprehensive review examines the current state of knowledge regarding hypospadias epidemiology, classification systems, surgical techniques, outcomes, and complications.A systematic literature search was conducted across PubMed, Google Scholar, and relevant pediatric urology journals from 2015 to 2025. Studies were selected based on relevance to hypospadias surgical management, outcome measures, and evidence quality.The tubularized incised plate (TIP) urethroplasty remains the most widely performed technique for distal hypospadias, with fistula rates ranging from 5-10%. Two-stage repairs, particularly the Bracka technique, demonstrate superior outcomes for proximal hypospadias with success rates of approximately 90%. Overall reoperation rates reach 48.2%, with complications occurring most frequently within the first three months post-surgery. Patient satisfaction rates range from 86-92%, though long-term functional outcomes require further investigation. Modern hypospadias surgery has evolved significantly, with standardized classification systems enabling better patient selection and outcome prediction. Multidisciplinary approaches incorporating preoperative hormonal stimulation, refined surgical techniques, and structured follow-up protocols are essential for optimizing outcomes in this challenging patient population.
Downloads
References
1. Bhatia V, Fernandez N, Long C, et al. Advancements in hypospadias management: trends, techniques, training, and patient-centric outcomes. Urol Res Pract. 2024;50(2):94-105. Available at: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11232038/
2. Martinez ADCR, Barrientos-Villegas S, et al. Hypospadias: a review. Int Surg J. 2024. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/382733207_Hypospadias_a_review
3. Snodgrass W. Tubularized incised plate urethroplasty for distal hypospadias. J Urol. 1994;151(2):464-465.
4. Shalaby MM, Ismail MA. Comparative analysis of surgical outcomes for coronal hypospadias repair in relation to surgical technique: A tertiary center cohort study. Egypt J Hosp Med. 2025;85(1). Available at: https://ejhm.journals.ekb.eg/article_462721.html
5. Holland AJ, Smith GH, Ross FI, et al. The Glans-Meatus-Shaft (GMS) hypospadias score: patient outcome analysis at a single institution over 10 years. J Pediatr Urol. 2010;6(5):469-474.
6. Anttila A, Taskinen S, Rintala R, et al. Cumulative re-operation rates during follow-up after hypospadias repair. BJU Int. 2024. Available at: https://bjui-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bju.16519
7. Comparing the incidence of hypospadias across the United States. J Pediatr Urol. 2025. Available at: https://www.jpurol.com/article/S1477-5131(25)00002-6/abstract
8. Prevalence of hypospadias in newborns in tropical province of China. Medicine. 2025;104(20). Available at: https://journals.lww.com/md-journal/fulltext/2025/05090/prevalence_of_hypospadias_in_newborns_in_tropical.35.aspx
9. Epidemiology of hypospadias: A systematic review. World J Urol. 2023.
10. Zhang Y, Wang J, Yang H, et al. The potential mechanisms underlying phthalate-induced hypospadias: a systematic review of rodent model studies. Front Endocrinol. 2024;15:1490011. Available at: https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/endocrinology/articles/10.3389/fendo.2024.1490011/full
11. Genetic factors in hypospadias. Eur J Hum Genet. 2021.
12. Amoushahi M, Jørgensen PH, et al. MicroRNAs and hypospadias: A systematic review. Medicine Int. 2024.
13. Kim SK, Kim S. Expert classification of hypospadias: an external validation and evaluation of agreement for Glans-Urethral Meatus-Shaft (GMS) and Hypospadias Objective Penile Evaluation (HOPE) scores. J Pediatr Urol. 2024. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39158792
14. Holland AJ, Smith GH. The Glans-Urethral Meatus-Shaft (GMS) score: A simple scoring system for hypospadias. J Pediatr Urol. 2013.
15. van der Toorn F, de Jong TPVM, de Gier RP, et al. Introducing the HOPE (Hypospadias Objective Penile Evaluation)-score: a validation study of an objective scoring system for evaluating cosmetic appearance in operated hypospadias. J Pediatr Urol. 2013;9(6):835-841.
16. Understanding health-related quality of life after hypospadias repair. Baylor College of Medicine. 2024. Available at: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12067356/
17. Snodgrass WT. Tubularized incised plate urethroplasty for distal hypospadias. J Urol. 1994;151(2):464-465.
18. Borkar N, Tiwari C, Nair A, et al. Tubularized incised plate urethroplasty and grafted tubularized incised plate urethroplasty: systematic review, meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. World J Pediatr Surg. 2024;7(1):e000707. Available at: https://wjps.bmj.com/content/7/1/e000707
19. Pezzoli M, Lo Re M, Carletti V, et al. Impact of second-layer coverages on complication rates in primary tubularized incised plate urethroplasty (TIPU) for distal and midpenile hypospadias repair: a systematic review. Pediatr Surg Int. 2025. Available at: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00383-025-06134-3
20. Mansour AM, Ismail EA, Abdalla MO, et al. Additive outcome of platelet rich fibrin neourethral coverage of tubularized incised plate in primary distal hypospadias repair. BMC Urol. 2024;24:1-10. Available at: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12894-024-01591-9
21. Pezzoli M, et al. Impact of second-layer coverages on complication rates. Pediatr Surg Int. 2025.
22. Mathieu P. Traitement en un temps de l'hypospadias balanique et balanopreputial. Technique Chirurgicale. 1932.
23. Outcomes in distal hypospadias: a systematic review of the Mathieu and tubularized incised plate repairs. J Pediatr Urol. 2012. Available at: https://www.academia.edu/download/53356520/j.jpurol.2010.11.00820170601-20054-1llo914.pdf
24. Mathieu Urethroplasty as a Salvage Procedure: 20-Year Experience. J Urol. 2003.
25. Duckett JW. MAGPI (meatal advancement and glanuloplasty): A procedure for subcoronal hypospadias. Urol Clin North Am. 1981;8(3):515-524.
26. MAGPI hypospadias repair: Factors that determine outcome. Indian J Urol. 2013;29(3):234-237.
27. Hypospadias: A comprehensive review including its embryology, etiology and surgical techniques. Cureus. 2024. Available at: https://www.cureus.com/articles/104846-hypospadias-a-comprehensive-review-including-its-embryology-etiology-and-surgical-techniques
28. Bracka A. Hypospadias repair: The two-stage alternative. Br J Plast Surg. 1995;48(2):122-125.
29. Two-Stage Repair for Primary Hypospadias: Functional and Cosmetic Outcomes in 145 Cases With a Follow-Up Period of Over Five Years. J Urol. 2025. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0022346825003781
30. Two-Stage Repair for re-do Hypospadias: Results of Over 5-Year Follow-Up. Int J Urol. 2024. Available at: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/iju.70098
31. Comparative study of modified Koyanagi and staged Duckett for proximal hypospadias. BMC Urol. 2024;24:1-10. Available at: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12894-024-01608-3
32. Koyanagi T, et al. One-stage repair of severe hypospadias with severe chordee. J Urol. 1984;132(6):1150-1152.
33. An attractive technique for the severe hypospadias repair. J Pediatr Urol. 2024. Available at: https://www.jpurol.com/article/S1477-5131(24)00605-3/fulltext
34. Neomodified Koyanagi: one-time success 87.6%. Clin Case Rep. 2024. Available at: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ccr3.5575
35. The effect of preoperative hormonal stimulation on the urethral plate. J Pediatr Urol. 2024. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1477513124003498
36. Synergy Between Pediatric Surgeons and Endocrinologists. Cureus. 2024. Available at: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11941265/
37. Updated Report on Preoperative Testosterone Hormone Therapy in Hypospadias Reconstruction: Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Malays J Med Health Sci. 2025. Available at: https://medic.upm.edu.my/upload/dokumen/2025040709141823_MJMHS_0380.pdf
38. Preoperative hormonal stimulation effect on hypospadias repair complications: Meta-analysis of observational versus randomized controlled studies. J Pediatr Urol. 2017.
39. A scoping review on chordee correction in boys with ventral congenital penile curvature and hypospadias. Indian J Urol. 2024;40(1). Available at: https://journals.lww.com/indianjurol/fulltext/2024/01000/a_scoping_review_on_chordee_correction_in_boys.4.aspx
40. Abouzeid AA, Seada M, Waly M. Late chordee correction after tubularized incised plate repair for proximal hypospadias: An underreported problem. UroPrecision. 2024. Available at: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/uro2.68
41. Braga LHP, Pippi Salle JL, Dave S, et al. Outcome analysis of severe chordee correction using tunica vaginalis as a flap in boys with proximal hypospadias. J Urol. 2007;178(4):1697-1701.
42. Demirtas G, Ekberli G, Tagci S, et al. Urethral plate transection for chordee release in severe proximal hypospadias cases. Sci Rep. 2025;15. Available at: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-025-00079-2
43. Risk factors for urethrocutaneous fistula following hypospadias repair. Int Urol Nephrol. 2025. Available at: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12301-025-00534-6
44. Hardwicke JT, et al. Fistula after single-stage primary hypospadias repair – a systematic review of the literature. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2015.
45. Singh J, et al. Urethrocutaneous fistula repair following hypospadias repair: PATIO repair. J Pediatr Urol. 2022. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1477513121005702
46. Is the Autologous Testicular Tunica Vaginalis Graft effective in persistent urethrocutaneous fistulas after hypospadias surgery? J Urol Surgery. 2025. Available at: https://jurolsurgery.org/articles/is-the-autologous-testicular-tunica-vaginalis-graft-effective-in-persistent-urethrocutaneous-fistulas-after-hypospadias-surgery-a-comparative-study/doi/jus.galenos.2025.2025-2-12
47. The long-term risk of urethral stricture following pediatric hypospadias repair: a population-based cohort study. SSRN. 2024. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=5810057
48. Surgical Management of Anterior Urethral Stricture: A 23-year Single-Center Study. Res Rep Urol. 2025. Available at: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.2147/RRU.S507169
49. Urethral stricture management in hypospadias. Nat Rev Urol. 2011.
50. Long-Term Risk of Reoperation After Hypospadias Surgery. J Urol. 2024. Available at: https://www.auajournals.org/doi/10.1097/JU.0000000000004715
51. Hammouda HM. The long-term consequences of the hypospadias salvage repair issue. BMC Pediatr. 2024;24:1-10. Available at: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12887-024-04534-3
52. Gnech M, et al. Surgical and functional outcomes of Dorsal Inlay Graft urethroplasty for revision hypospadias repair. J Pediatr Urol. 2024. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1477513124000159
53. Gunawan IPGF, et al. Self-reported outcomes in adults with hypospadias: A meta-analysis. J Pediatr Urol. 2025. Available at: https://www.jpurol.com/article/S1477-5131(25)00004-X/pdf
54. Effendi R, et al. Adult Sexual Function Following Hypospadias Repair in Childhood. Gold J Urol. 2025. Available at: https://www.goldjournal.net/article/S0090-4295(25)00471-6/fulltext
55. Ramnarine SD, et al. Long term follow-up on young adults that underwent hypospadias repair. J Pediatr Urol. 2024. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38735874/
56. Development of a prototype of a patient-reported outcomes measure for hypospadias care. J Pediatr Urol. 2024. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1477513124004236
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
