Quality of life and functional outcomes after organ-preserving for oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma

Authors

  • Wael Mohamed Ahmed
  • Mohammad Abrar Bhat
  • Mohamed Abdelkader Elmenshawi
  • Osama Ahmed Hamdi
  • Alaa Abdelrhman Ali El Sead Ghiat
  • Barrag Alhazmi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63682/jns.v13i1.10009

Keywords:

Organ preservation, Quality of life, Functional outcomes, Cancer, Surgery

Abstract


 Background: Combining organ preservation strategies with free-flap reconstructions is a leading approach in treating oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs).

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to analyze the clinical characteristics, functional outcomes, and quality of life of patients undergoing organ-preserving surgery for oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.

Methods: The study consisted of a single-institution retrospective cohort study with cross-sectional assessment for patients treated from January 2020 to December 2024. Functional outcomes were measured using the Voice Handicap Index-10 (VHI-10); speech intelligibility grading; dysphagia and other clinical severity measures, such as the Dewar's Scale (DOSS); and endoscopic functional swallowing tests. The participants' overall quality of life (QoL)was measured using the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-H&N35 functional outcomes questionnaires (QoL).

Results: A total of 72 participants were included. Most were male and younger than 70 years with minimal comorbidities. Good voice, speech, and swallowing function were exhibited by more than half. Speech with 61% of the participants and swallowing functioning normally in 57% was present. Overall quality of life was good, with a mean global QoL score of 72.4 ± 18.9. Functional domain scores were high, particularly in the high range for the physical and emotional-social domains. Dry mouth and sticky saliva, associated with and occurring after radiotherapy, were the most severe symptoms.

Conclusion: Patients with stage I and II oral and oropharyngeal cancer who undergo organ conservation with free flap techniques SCC have a good quality of life and functional outcomes with minimal treatment sequelae.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Park EJ, Baik SH. Functional outcomes after sphincter-preserving surgeries for low-lying rectal cancer: a review. Precision and Future Medicine. 2021;5(4):164-174.

[2] Nocera F, Angehrn F, von Flüe M, Steinemann DC. Optimising functional outcomes in rectal cancer surgery. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2021;406(2):233-250.

[3] Bach SP, Gilbert A, Brock K, Korsgen S, Geh I, Hill J, et al. Radical surgery versus organ preservation via short-course radiotherapy followed by transanal endoscopic microsurgery for early-stage rectal cancer (TREC): a randomised, open-label feasibility study. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021;6(2):92-105.

[4] Quinsan IDCM, Costa GC, Priante AVM, Cardoso CA, Nunes CLS. Functional outcomes and survival of patients with oral and oropharyngeal cancer after total glossectomy. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2020;86(5):545-551.

[5] Riva G, Sapino S, Ravera M, Elia G, Pecorari G. Long-term functional outcomes and quality of life after partial glossectomy for T2 squamous cell carcinomas. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2022;88:S33-S43.

[6] Nemade H, Thaduri A, Gondi JT, Chava S, Kumar A, Raj P, et al. Five-year long-term functional and quality of life outcomes in total glossectomy survivors. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2025;282(4):2063-2070.

[7] Kang SB, Cho JR, Jeong SY, Oh JH, Ahn S, Choi S, et al. Quality of life after sphincter preservation surgery or abdominoperineal resection for low rectal cancer (ASPIRE): a long-term prospective, multicentre, cohort study. Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2021;6:100087.

[8] Pappou EP, Temple LK, Patil S, Smith JJ, Wei IH, Nash GM, et al. Quality of life and function after rectal cancer surgery with and without sphincter preservation. Front Oncol. 2022;12:944843.

[9] Rullier E, Vendrely V, Asselineau J, Rouanet P, Tuech JJ, Valverde A, et al. Organ preservation with chemoradiotherapy plus local excision for rectal cancer: 5-year results of the GRECCAR 2 randomised trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;5(5):465-474.

[10] Yi CR, Jeong WS, Oh TS, Koh KS, Choi JW. Analysis of speech and functional outcomes in tongue reconstruction after hemiglossectomy. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2020;36(7):507-513.

[11] McCarthy ASE, Solomon MJ, Koh CE, Firouzbakht A, Jackson SA, Steffens D. Quality of life and functional outcomes following pelvic exenteration and sacrectomy. Colorectal Dis. 2020;22(5):521-528.

[12] Cai Z, Yuan X, Li H, Feng X, Du C, Han K, et al. Bowel function, quality of life, and mental health of patients with high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia or T1 colorectal cancer after organ-preserving versus organ-resection surgeries: a cross-sectional study at a Chinese tertiary care center. Surg Endosc. 2024;38(10):5756-5768.

[13] Collard M, Lefevre JH. Ultimate functional preservation with intersphincteric resection for rectal cancer. Front Oncol. 2020;10:297.

[14] Sun G, Lou Z, Zhang H, Yu GY, Zheng K, Gao XH, et al. Retrospective study of the functional and oncological outcomes of conformal sphincter preservation operation in the treatment of very low rectal cancer. Tech Coloproctol. 2020;24(10):1025-1034.

[15] Nicoletti R, Alberti A, Castellani D, Yee CH, Zhang K, Poon DM, et al. Functional outcomes and safety of focal therapy for prostate cancer: a systematic review on results and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2024;27(4):614-622.

[16] Fokas E, Appelt A, Glynne-Jones R, Beets G, Perez R, Garcia-Aguilar J, et al. International consensus recommendations on key outcome measures for organ preservation after (chemo)radiotherapy in patients with rectal cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2021;18(12):805-816.

[17] Baird P, Steinke JD, Minnaar HS, Stewart AJ. Assessment of quality of life in rectal cancer with organ-preservation treatment: are we there yet? Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2023;35(2):e110-e120.

[18] van der Valk MJ, van der Sande ME, Toebes RE, Breukink SO, Bröker ME, Doornebosch PG, et al. Importance of patient reported and clinical outcomes for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer and their treating physicians: do clinicians know what patients want? Eur J Surg Oncol. 2020;46(9):1634-1641.

[19] Fernández-Martínez D, Rodríguez-Infante A, Otero-Díez JL, Baldonedo-Cernuda RF, Mosteiro-Díaz MP, García-Flórez LJ. Is my life going to change? A review of quality of life after rectal resection. J Gastrointest Oncol. 2020;11(1):91-102.

[20] Visini M, Giger R, Shelan M, Elicin O, Anschuetz L. Predicting factors for oncological and functional outcome in hypopharyngeal cancer. Laryngoscope. 2021;131(5):E1543-E1549.

[21] Kouka M, Beckmann L, Bitter T, Kaftan H, Böger D, Büntzel J, et al. Oncological and functional outcome after laryngectomy for laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancer: a population-based analysis in Germany from 2001 to 2020. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):7761.

[22] Pfuetzenreiter EG Jr, Ferreron GF, Sadka JZ, de Souza ABP, Matos LL, Kowalski LP, et al. Total laryngectomy vs non-surgical organ preservation in advanced laryngeal cancer: a meta-analysis. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2024;90(3):101404.

[23] Ghignone F, Hernandez P, Mahmoud NN, Ugolini G. Functional recovery in senior adults undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer: assessment tools and strategies to preserve functional status. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2020;46(3):387-393.

[24] Hammermüller C, Hinz A, Dietz A, Wichmann G, Pirlich M, Berger T, et al. Depression, anxiety, fatigue, and quality of life in a large sample of patients suffering from head and neck cancer in comparison with the general population. BMC Cancer. 2021;21(1):94...

Downloads

Published

2024-12-07

How to Cite

1.
Ahmed WM, Abrar Bhat M, Abdelkader Elmenshawi M, Hamdi OA, Ali El Sead Ghiat AA, Alhazmi B. Quality of life and functional outcomes after organ-preserving for oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. J Neonatal Surg [Internet]. 2024 Dec. 7 [cited 2026 Feb. 25];13(1):2142-50. Available from: https://jneonatalsurg.com/index.php/jns/article/view/10009

Issue

Vol. 13 (2024): Journal of Neonatal Surgery

Section

Original Article

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

You are free to:

  • Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.

Terms:

  • Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
  • No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.